Why the Caribbean Must Realign: The Economic, Geopolitical and Sovereignty Case
Okay, someone has to say it!
The Caribbean's strategic future lies in diversification, not dependency—deepening ties with China, African nations, regions of Europe, Canada, and Mexico is one way to escape an increasingly volatile "America First" order and reclaim economic, geopolitical, social and sovereignty space. Across the world, countries from Europe to Canada are doing precisely this, re-wiring trade and diplomacy so that the United States becomes one partner among many, not the unchallengeable centre.
America First, Trump 2.0 and Caribbean vulnerability
Trump's return has hardened a doctrine that sees the Caribbean less as a community of sovereign states and more as a security buffer for U.S. migration, drugs and great-power rivalry. Project 2025-style blueprints promise reduced development aid, climate denial at the EPA, harsher deportations, and a crusade to push back against "non-Western" influence in Latin America and the Caribbean—all of which translate into greater pressure and fewer resources for the region.
This matters because:
• U.S. tariffs have surged and become more broad-based, raising the effective tariff rate on many emerging-market exports and injecting uncertainty into global trade flows that Caribbean economies depend on.
• Security is now framed almost entirely through migration enforcement and border control, with proposals to outsource deportees to third countries in the region and to strong-arm Caribbean governments into accepting them.
In short, the old bargain—automatic loyalty to Washington in exchange for predictable aid, access and protection—no longer exists.
Why China looks attractive: economics and development
China's rise offers the Caribbean something the U.S. is no longer willing, or perhaps able, to provide at scale: long-term development finance, infrastructure and a seat at the table of the emerging world economy. In 2024 alone, Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) engagement worldwide reached approximately 121–122 billion dollars in construction and investment deals, bringing cumulative BRI engagement to above 1.1 trillion dollars since 2013.
For Caribbean governments confronting climate change, crumbling infrastructure and narrow fiscal space, several features of China's engagement stand out:
• Infrastructure and BRI finance: Chinese banks and companies are willing to fund ports, roads, energy, tourism and telecoms projects that Western lenders often reject as too small, too risky or not commercially viable enough.
• Trade and investment diversification: China-Latin America and Caribbean trade has surged into the hundreds of billions of dollars, with the region absorbing a growing share of Chinese outward foreign direct investment in energy, mining, manufacturing and services.
• Development cooperation: Chinese policy documents on Latin America and the Caribbean promise stepped-up support for agriculture, health, education, digital infrastructure and climate resilience—areas where U.S. programmes are shrinking under the new administration.
None of this is risk-free; debt sustainability, opaque contracts, and overreliance on a single new patron are real concerns. But in a world where traditional lenders impose austerity while Washington imposes tariffs, Chinese capital looks less like a temptation and more like an insurance policy.
Geopolitics, social realities and sovereignty
Geopolitically, deeper relations with China are less about "choosing Beijing over Washington" and more about refusing to be trapped in someone else's Cold War reboot. China has institutionalized its outreach through summits, policy papers and regional credit lines, treating Latin America and the Caribbean as a legitimate diplomatic arena rather than a forbidden backyard.
This has several implications:
• Balancing leverage: When Washington demands alignment on sanctions, votes at the OAS, or security deployments, Caribbean governments with alternative partners have greater bargaining power and room to say no.
• Social alignment: Chinese offers in education, technology, agriculture and health resonate with Caribbean priorities such as youth employment, food security and digital transformation more than U.S. obsessions with drugs and migration.
• Sovereignty and non-interference: Beijing's rhetoric of "mutual respect" and non-interference, however imperfect in practice, contrasts sharply with U.S. strategies that threaten to cut aid, visas or investment if Caribbean states cooperate with "non-hemispheric competitors."
Seen from Kingston, Port of Spain or Bridgetown, the question is not whether China is virtuous; it is whether any small state should allow a single power—especially one in visible relative decline—to dictate who it trades with and how it governs.
The world is moving on: global diversification
What the Caribbean is contemplating is not radical; it is simply catching up to the rest of the world. Trade protectionism has become part of the "new geopolitical normal," peaking in 2025 as the new U.S. administration escalated tariffs and weaponized access to its market.
Everywhere, states are responding by diversifying away from U.S. dependence:
• In Europe, the EU has signed dozens of trade agreements with partners from Japan and South Korea to Canada and Singapore, explicitly using diversification to build "strategic autonomy" from both Washington and Beijing.
• In Asia, U.S. allies and partners such as Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and ASEAN states are mastering the art of hedging: keeping security ties with the U.S. while deepening economic integration with China and other Asian economies.
• Globally, analysts speak of a "great diversification," as firms and governments redirect supply chains and finance toward multiple hubs rather than relying on a U.S.-centric model that is now riddled with tariffs, sanctions and political shocks.
The United States is quietly diversifying—reducing its dependence on Chinese manufacturing and increasing trade with Mexico and ASEAN—while telling others to remain loyal. If the hegemon is hedging, why should the Caribbean not do the same?
Canada's blueprint and the lesson for the Caribbean
Canada offers a useful reference point, especially for Caribbean audiences familiar with its politics and diaspora links. Ottawa's Indo-Pacific Strategy explicitly acknowledges China as a disruptive but unavoidable great power, committing to both push back against Beijing where necessary and cooperate where it serves Canadian interests.
Key elements of Canada's approach include:
• Intentional diversification: Canada has rebranded its trade policy around diversification, negotiating agreements with the EU and Asia-Pacific partners to reduce over-reliance on the U.S. market even as Trump-era tariffs bite.
• Pragmatic engagement with China: Rather than a simple "decouple," Canada is mapping out a blueprint that protects national security and values while still pursuing trade, investment and climate cooperation with Beijing where possible.
Managing China, rejecting scare tactics
Any serious Caribbean strategy must approach China with clear eyes: some Belt and Road projects have produced unsustainable debt, opaque contracts, and leverage that Beijing can exploit, as seen in a string of distressed infrastructure loans across the Global South. These experiences are not a reason to slam the door on China, but a warning to negotiate more aggressively—insist on transparency, diversify partners, and ensure that every project strengthens, rather than weakens, sovereignty.
At the same time, the region cannot afford to be dragged back into Trump's reheated Cold War, where anyone who disagrees with "America First" is smeared as a communist or socialist. That kind of red-baiting still scares parts of the U.S. electorate, but it has far less power in a world where most societies blend markets, state direction and social programmes in their own way.
Outside the United States, more governments and publics are judging China less by its party label and more by what its system appears to deliver: rapid poverty reduction, large-scale infrastructure and a loudly advertised "people-centred" development philosophy. Recent international polling indicates that in many countries—especially in the Global South—confidence in U.S. leadership has eroded. At the same time, perceptions of China's economic weight and global influence have improved and, in some cases, even surpassed those of the U.S.
For the Caribbean, the lesson is simple: do not import U.S. culture-war labels or anyone's political model. Engage every partner—American, Chinese or otherwise—strictly on whether they help deliver what is truly people-centred at home: jobs, infrastructure, climate resilience and social protection for Caribbean citizens.
Climate finance is a survival issue, not an ideological choice. Latin America and the Caribbean need a 4–5-fold increase in climate finance to meet their commitments, yet current flows from traditional donors fall far short of the required level. Engaging both China and the U.S. on climate and green infrastructure—ports, grids, renewables, coastal protection—is not optional ideology but a survival strategy for societies exposed to hurricanes and rising sea levels. The Caribbean cannot afford to reject any partner willing to fund adaptation and resilience simply because Washington disapproves.
The Caribbean's real project: from dependency to autonomy
Framed this way, the debate is not "Should the Caribbean abandon America for China?" but "How can the Caribbean stop being structurally dependent on any single power?" Trump 2.0 accelerates U.S. isolation and unpredictability; Chinese BRI finance and South-South diplomacy open new options; global trends show that diversification is now best practice, not betrayal.
For Caribbean leaders, the task is to:
• Use Chinese finance and technology to close infrastructure and development gaps, while guarding against unsustainable debt and insisting on transparency.
• Maintain constructive ties with the U.S., Canada and Europe, but refuse to accept an updated Monroe Doctrine that treats Chinese engagement as a crime and Caribbean sovereignty as negotiable.
• Anchor all external relationships—American, Chinese or otherwise—in a clear vision of a more autonomous Caribbean, one that negotiates from strength, plays powers off against each other when necessary and always prioritizes the interests of its own people.
The rest of the world is already moving toward that multipolar future. The only real question is whether the Caribbean will arrive there as a reluctant follower or as a region that chose, early and deliberately, to realign on its own terms.
Comments